Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928609›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2025

Acquired uterine arteriovenous malformation: efficacy of the use of absorbable haemostatic gelatin in uterine artery embolisation.

Thay Hui Tan, Kenneth K Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thay Hui TanMonash Imaging, Monash Health, VIC, Clayton, Australia. thayhuitan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5033-8095
Kenneth K LauMonash Imaging, Monash Health, VIC, Clayton, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-9947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and complications of absorbable haemostatic gelatin uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic acquired uterine arterio-venous malformation (UAVM).

methodsAll the adult female patients who had acute urogenital bleeding due to UAVM confirmed on ultrasound and received uterine artery embolisation (UAE) for UAVM in a tertiary institution between January 2000 and October 2024 were included. Patients who had UAE for other causes were excluded. Causes of UAVM, embolic agents used, procedural success, recurrent genital bleeding, and complications like pulmonary embolism and groin bleeding were recorded.

resultsSeven female patients (mean age: 34 years) with 8 UAE procedures were included, with three postpartum and four after miscarriages. The mean length of follow-up after UAE was 50 months. Absorbable gelatin was used in six patients, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles were used in one patient. 5/6 patients (83.3%) had successful UAE with absorbable haemostatic gelatin. There were no procedure-related complications, including pulmonary embolism and uterine infarcts. Only one patient required a repeated UAE 33 days later for recurrent vaginal bleeding, which required sodium tetradecyl sulphate injection and microcoils during embolisation.

conclusionAcquired UAVM is very rare but life-threatening. Absorbable haemostatic gelatin, a temporary embolic agent, appears safe and effective in treating UAVM with uterine preservation. It eliminates the potential risk of uterine infarction that might occur with permanent embolic agents.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous MalformationsGelatinGelatin Sponge, AbsorbableHemostaticsUterine Artery EmbolizationAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUterusGelatinHemostaticsUterine arteriovenous malformationUterine artery embolisation

Identifiers

PMID40928609
PMCPMC12496261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.