Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928554›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Biomechanical superiority of novel dynamic tape over standard tape suture in distal triceps tendon repair: a human cadaveric study testing an intense early rehabilitation protocol.

Moritz Kraus, Bogdan Bocea, Nicolas Ion, Mehar Dhillon, Ivan Zderic, Luise Puls, Boyko Gueorguiev, R Geoff Richards, Hans-Christoph Pape, Tatjana Pastor and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Moritz KrausAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland. moritz.kraus@usz.ch.
Bogdan BoceaAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Nicolas IonAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Mehar DhillonAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Ivan ZdericAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Luise PulsAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
R Geoff RichardsAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Hans-Christoph PapeDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tatjana PastorDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bürgerspital Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Torsten PastorMedical Faculty, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistal triceps tendon rupture is related to high complication rates with up to 25% failures. Elbow stiffness is another severe complication, as the traditional approach considers prolonged immobilization to ensure tendon healing. Recently, a dynamic tape was designed, implementing a silicone-infused core for braid shortening and preventing repair elongation during mobilization, thus maintaining constant tissue approximation. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanically the novel dynamic tape versus conventional tape in a human cadaveric distal triceps tendon repair model.

methodsSixteen paired arms from eight donors were split to two groups. Distal triceps tendon tenotomies and repairs were performed via the crossed transosseous locking Krackow stitch technique for anatomic footprint repair. Either conventional (SutureTape) or the novel dynamic tape (DYNATape) were used. A postoperative protocol mimicking intense early rehabilitation was simulated by a 9-day, 300-cycle daily mobilization under 150 N load followed by a final destructive test.

resultsSignificant differences were identified between the groups regarding the displacement over time at the distal, intermediate, and proximal tendon aspects, p < 0.001. DYNATape demonstrated significantly less displacement compared to SutureTape (4.6 ± 1.2 mm versus 7.8 ± 2.1 mm) and higher load to failure (637 ± 113 N versus 341 ± 230 N), p ≤ 0.037. DYNATape retracted 0.95 ± 1.95 mm after each 24-hour period and withstood the whole cyclic loading sequence without failure. In contrast, SutureTape failed early in three specimens.

conclusionDYNATape demonstrated improved biomechanical competence compared to SutureTape in a distal triceps tendon repair model, with significantly lower maximal displacement and higher load to failure. These findings indicate that DYNATape may offer a more stable construct under controlled laboratory conditions. Knot slippage and bone-related complications observed in both groups underscore the technical challenges associated with this repair technique and highlight the importance of precise surgical execution.

Indexed as

Surgical TapeSuture TechniquesTendon InjuriesAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomechanical assessmentCadaveric studyDistal triceps tendon ruptureDYNATapeEarly rehabilitationSutureTape

Identifiers

PMID40928554
PMCPMC12423150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.