ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Self-efficacy for cancer self-management in the context of COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Randomized Controlled Trial: eHealth Interventions for Self-Management and Psychological Coping in Cancer Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the effect of perioperative nursing intervention for esophageal cancer patients based on the ADOPT nursing model.Medicine · 2026Article
- Distinctive trajectories of symptom burden, activities of daily living, and self-efficacy among patients with advanced cancer receiving care in an acute palliative care unit: a pilot longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFor cancer survivors, self-efficacy is needed to manage the disease and the effects of treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer-related healthcare, which may have impacted self-management self-efficacy. We investigated self-efficacy reported by cancer survivors during COVID-19, including associations with healthcare disruptions, distress, and general health.
methodsBetween 2020 and 2021, 1902 individuals aged 18-80 years with a recent cancer diagnosis completed a survey regarding the effects of COVID-19 on healthcare, self-efficacy for managing cancer and social interactions, cancer-related distress, and perceived general health. Linear and logistic models estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between self-efficacy scores, healthcare disruptions, significant distress, and general health.
resultsMean self-efficacy for managing cancer was 7.58 out of 10. Greater self-efficacy was associated with lower odds for distress (OR 0.18 [95% CI 0.13-0.26], quartile 4 vs. 1) and for worse general health (0.05 [0.03-0.09]). Participants with disruptions to cancer-related healthcare had lower self-efficacy for managing cancer compared to those without (6.62 vs. 7.09, respectively, P < 0.001) and higher odds for distress (1.70 [1.36-2.14]), but not worse general health (1.13 [0.39-1.44]). Lower self-efficacy mediated 27% of the association between healthcare disruptions and increased distress (15-47%). Associations with self-efficacy for managing social interactions trended in the same direction.
conclusionsDuring COVID-19, disruptions to cancer-related healthcare were associated with lower self-efficacy, increased distress, and worse general health. Psychosocial interventions designed to overcome barriers and target self-efficacy may be important for enhancing outcomes among cancer survivors experiencing disruptions in healthcare access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.