ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Guide Tip Damage Due to Rotablation.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2026.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rotational atherectomy system can effectively debulk calcified coronary lesions. However, rare complications specific to that system have been reported. CASE SUMMARY: A 77-year-old man with a heavily calcified lesion in the right coronary artery (RCA) ostium underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in an 8-F system. During the procedure, rotablation with a 2.25-mm burr was required. After the percutaneous coronary intervention, partial loss of the tip of the guide was observed. He had no clinical sequelae despite the presumed retained catheter material in his body. DISCUSSION: Although insufficient guide coaxiality has been suggested as the primary cause of guide tip fracture during RCA ostial ablation, other factors may have contributed: the application of force to the tip and a small difference in size between the guide and the burr. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: When ablating RCA ostial lesions, positioning the burr platform outside the guide may help prevent similar complications in future cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.