ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2025
From Trials to Practice: A 2025 Review of Idecabtagene Vicleucel and Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Efficacy Across Clinical Studies and Real-World Evidence.
Review in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient preferences for treatment‑free intervals in multiple myeloma: mixed‑methods insights on monitoring trade‑offs and supportive care improvements.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific Determinants of Response to BCMA- and GPRC5D-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A QSP Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Real-world outcomes for multiple myeloma patients after apheresis for planned chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.World journal of experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Association of ciltacabtagene autoleucel with immune effector cell-associated enterocolitis: insights from a large national database.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Improving CAR T cell therapy against malignancies through gene knock-down/out strategies: a systematic review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- From Trials to Practice: A 2025 Review of Idecabtagene Vicleucel and Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Efficacy Across Clinical Studies and Real-World Evidence.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have revolutionized the approach and management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and as of 2025, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) are the only BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapies approved by the FDA. Exceptional responses were demonstrated for heavily pretreated patients in the KarMMa-1 trial, reporting a 73% overall response rate (ORR) and 98% in the CARTITUDE-1 trial. Furthermore, both therapies show a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard regimens when administered in earlier lines. Current real-world evidence confirms their effectiveness and manageable safety in a more diverse patient population, including those who would have been ineligible for clinical trials. Key toxicities include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, with emerging concerns regarding delayed neurotoxicities, second primary malignancies, and IEC-enterocolitis. This review provides a detailed analysis of recent clinical trial data, the reported outcomes of real-world published evidence, and the changing role of these therapies within the myeloma treatment paradigm, including challenges, gaps in knowledge, potential barriers to accessibility, and future directions aimed at optimizing the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for MM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.