Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928436›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2025

From Trials to Practice: A 2025 Review of Idecabtagene Vicleucel and Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Efficacy Across Clinical Studies and Real-World Evidence.

Hector Garcia Pleitez, Sakditad Saowapa, Andrea Ortiz Maldonado, Chanakarn Kanitthamniyom, Diego Olavarria Bernal, Lukman Tijani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient preferences for treatment‑free intervals in multiple myeloma: mixed‑methods insights on monitoring trade‑offs and supportive care improvements.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hector Garcia PleitezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9711-7473
Sakditad SaowapaDivision of Hematology Oncology and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Andrea Ortiz MaldonadoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Chanakarn KanitthamniyomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Diego Olavarria BernalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Lukman TijaniDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have revolutionized the approach and management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and as of 2025, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) are the only BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapies approved by the FDA. Exceptional responses were demonstrated for heavily pretreated patients in the KarMMa-1 trial, reporting a 73% overall response rate (ORR) and 98% in the CARTITUDE-1 trial. Furthermore, both therapies show a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard regimens when administered in earlier lines. Current real-world evidence confirms their effectiveness and manageable safety in a more diverse patient population, including those who would have been ineligible for clinical trials. Key toxicities include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, with emerging concerns regarding delayed neurotoxicities, second primary malignancies, and IEC-enterocolitis. This review provides a detailed analysis of recent clinical trial data, the reported outcomes of real-world published evidence, and the changing role of these therapies within the myeloma treatment paradigm, including challenges, gaps in knowledge, potential barriers to accessibility, and future directions aimed at optimizing the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for MM patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAgedAge FactorsB-Cell Maturation AntigenClinical Trials as TopicCytokine Release SyndromeDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeurotoxicity SyndromesPatient SelectionAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB-Cell Maturation Antigenidecabtagene vicleucelReceptors, Chimeric AntigenBCMACAR T‐cellciltacabtagene autoleucelidecabtagene vicleucelmultiple myelomareal‐world outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40928436
PMCPMC12582907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.