ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Tumor-phrenic nerve spatial relationship and intraoperative traction-induced injury during mediastinal tumor resection: implications for real-time protective strategies.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhrenic nerve injury during mediastinal tumor resection can lead to significant postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction. Current intraoperative protection techniques are imprecise and lack real-time feedback. We aimed to develop and validate a quantifiable, multimodal neuroprotective strategy.
methodsA total of 370 patients undergoing minimally invasive mediastinal tumor resection were enrolled in a two-phase cohort. Tumor-nerve spatial parameters, traction force, and intraoperative temperature were measured. The intervention group received automated cold saline irrigation and pharmacologic protection triggered by predefined thresholds.
resultsPhrenic nerve injury occurred in 8.1% of the intervention group versus 18.4% in controls ( P = 0.009). Median time to diaphragmatic excursion recovery ≥1.5 cm was significantly shorter (5.2 vs 8.6 weeks, P < 0.001). LOESS curves revealed sharp inflection points in injury probability at tumor-nerve distance <4 mm, traction >10 min, and local temperature >39.5°C. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed all three as independent predictors (HRs: 2.17, 1.88, and 2.04, respectively). At 90 days, patients in the intervention group demonstrated superior pulmonary function (FEV 1 : 2.04 vs 1.83 L), longer 6-minute walk distance (442 vs 388 m), and higher QOL scores (77.0 vs 69.4; all P < 0.01). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed average savings >$3000 and QALY gains in all tumor subtypes.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that real-time, threshold-guided modulation of intraoperative mechanical and thermal stress can reduce phrenic nerve injury and enhance recovery, particularly in anatomically preserved but functionally vulnerable nerves. Rather than replacing surgical judgment, the proposed strategy provides a quantifiable, replicable adjunct for nerve preservation in technically challenging thoracic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.