ArticleJournal of vision2025
Binocular cues to 3D face structure increase activation in depth-selective visual cortex with negligible effects in face-selective areas.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of visual face processing often use flat images as proxies for real faces due to their ease of manipulation and experimental control. Although flat images capture many features of a face, they lack the rich three-dimensional (3D) structural information available when binocularly viewing real faces (e.g., binocular cues to a long nose). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the contribution of naturalistic binocular depth information to univariate activation levels and multivariate activation patterns in depth- and face-selective human brain regions. We used two cameras to capture images of real people from the viewpoints of the two eyes. These images were presented with natural viewing geometry (such that the size, distance, and binocular disparities were comparable to a real face at a typical viewing distance). Participants viewed stereopairs under four conditions: accurate binocular disparity (3D), zero binocular disparity (two-dimensional [2D]), reversed binocular disparity (pseudoscopic 3D), and no binocular disparity (monocular 2D). Although 3D faces (both 3D and pseudoscopic 3D) elicited higher activation levels than 2D faces, as well as distinct activation patterns, in depth-selective occipitoparietal regions (V3A, V3B, IPS0, IPS1, hMT+), face-selective occipitotemporal regions (OFA, FFA, pSTS) showed limited sensitivity to internal facial disparities. These results suggest that 2D images are a reasonable proxy for studying the neural basis of face recognition in face-selective regions, although contributions from 3D structural processing within the dorsal visual stream warrant further consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.