ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Multimodal machine learning for staging laparoscopy: a combined image analysis and morphologic tool for the discrimination of peritoneal metastasis.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: The Surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index: an Objective Score that Is Estimated Subjectively.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStaging laparoscopy (SL) is an essential procedure for peritoneal metastasis (PM) detection. Although surgeons are expected to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions intraoperatively, this task remains difficult and error-prone. The aim of this study was to develop a novel multimodal machine learning (MML) model to differentiate PM from benign lesions by integrating morphologic characteristics with intraoperative SL images. MATERIALS AND
methodsDeep learning (DL) models were trained to classify peritoneal lesions in video frames of patients undergoing SL for suspected PM. Two expert surgeons blinded to the pathology results performed an objective morphologic evaluation of these lesions. Traditional machine learning (ML) models were trained to predict tumors based on their morphology. A combined MML model was developed by integrating the best-performing morphology- and image-based models. The MML model was evaluated using an independent test set, and its predictions were compared with those of 13 oncologic surgeons.
resultsThe cohort included videos of 67 patients, with 453 consecutive biopsied lesions (benign: n = 197; malignant: n = 256). The MML model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-0.96], outperforming the best image-based DL model [AUC = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.87)], the best morphology-based ML [AUC = 0.86 (95% CI, 0.71-0.95)], and the surgeons' predictions [AUC = 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-1.00)].
conclusionsA novel MML model combining the visual and morphologic characteristics of peritoneal lesions was developed and internally validated, demonstrating good discriminative power for classifying PM during SL. This model shows promise as an intraoperative decision-support tool for surgeons, enhancing PM recognition and potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.