ArticleJournal of periodontal research2025
Multiomics Comparison of Proline-Rich Peptide-Enhanced Hyaluronic Acid Gels Versus Conventional Regenerative Materials: An Early Wound-Healing Model.
Article in Journal of periodontal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07581613 (A Novel Proline-rich Peptide Hydrogel for Periodontal Regeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Novel Proline-rich Peptide Hydrogel for Periodontal Regeneration: a Multicenter Parallel-arm Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limited Added Effect of Proline-Rich P6 Peptide to Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid After Partial Lateral Meniscectomy in Sheep.Smart medicine · 2026Article
- Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells delivered via a bioactive disordered peptide-hydrogel platform modulate early inflammation and enhance skeletal repair in a polytrauma model.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo compare the early wound-healing responses to crosslinked hyaluronic acid enriched with two proline-rich peptides (P2, P6) against unmodified hyaluronic acid and the enamel-matrix derivative (EMD) in a porcine gingival-detachment model.
methodsIn six pigs, defects around premolars were treated with HA, HA + P2, HA + P6 or EMD. After 6 days, the sites were harvested and evaluated using histology, immunohistochemistry, multiplex cytokine assay and untargeted proteomics of the gels, which were examined, informing an integrated multiomics approach analysis.
resultsBoth peptide formulations improved the composite histological score compared to HA alone, and HA + P6 matched EMD in suppressing oedema, TNF-α staining and CD80
conclusionHA + P6 suppressed TNF-α and trypsin signalling while boosting M2-linked markers and proresolution proteins to the same extent as EMD, whereas plain HA did not. Thus, adding a short proline-rich peptide confers EMD-like early immunomodulation on a fully synthetic HA carrier. These observations, although limited to 6-day soft tissue healing, warrant longer studies in true periodontal regeneration models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.