ArticleGenetics2025
Signatures of selective sweeps in continuous-space populations.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweeps.Genetics · 2026Article
- Genomic signatures of selection inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Soft Selective Sweeps Predominate in the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- The Influence of Demographic History and Genetic Architecture on Complex Traits via Runs of Homozygosity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Signatures of soft selective sweeps predominate in the yellow fever mosquitobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sweeps in Space: Leveraging Geographic Data to Identify Beneficial Alleles in Anopheles gambiae.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective sweeps describe the process by which an adaptive mutation arises and rapidly fixes in the population, thereby removing genetic variation in its genomic vicinity. The expected signatures of selective sweeps are relatively well understood in panmictic population models, yet natural populations often extend across larger geographic ranges where individuals are more likely to mate with those born nearby. To investigate how such spatial population structure can affect sweep dynamics and signatures, we simulated selective sweeps in populations inhabiting a two-dimensional continuous landscape. The maximum dispersal distance of offspring from their parents can be varied in our simulations from an essentially panmictic population to scenarios with increasingly limited dispersal. We find that in low-dispersal populations, adaptive mutations spread more slowly than in panmictic ones, while recombination becomes less effective at breaking up genetic linkage around the sweep locus. Together, these factors result in a trough of reduced genetic diversity around the sweep locus that looks very similar across dispersal rates. We also find that the site frequency spectrum around hard sweeps in low-dispersal populations is enriched for intermediate-frequency variants, making these sweeps appear softer than they are. Furthermore, haplotype heterozygosity at the sweep locus tends to be elevated in low-dispersal scenarios as compared to panmixia, contrary to what is observed in neutral scenarios without sweeps. The haplotype patterns generated by these hard sweeps in low-dispersal populations can resemble soft sweeps from standing genetic variation that arose from substantially older alleles. Our results highlight the need for better accounting for spatial population structure when making inferences about selective sweeps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.