Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927997›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Overcoming gaps and barriers to effectively integrate social science in European conservation.

Claudia Gruenewald, Thomas E Fish, Eick von Ruschkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Overcoming gaps and barriers to effectively integrate social science in European conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia GruenewaldCreating Solutions for Nature & People / People & Nature, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas E FishNational Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8737-7635
Eick von RuschkowskiAlfred Toepfer Academy for Nature Conservation, Schneverdingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of social science to address the human dimensions of natural resource management is increasingly recognized in the conservation field, yet the application of associated concepts, theories, methods, and data remains underrepresented in parts of Europe. Common barriers and gaps, persistent over decades, including institutional constraints, work environment, different cultures and languages between natural and social science disciplines, lack of qualified personnel, and an accessible professional community, are often cited as underlying and driving factors. To better understand, contextualize, and inform solutions for wider use of social science, we analyzed interactions with conservation researchers and practitioners across a series of organized events from 2018 to 2023 (e.g., in-depth interviews, facilitated discussions, expert workshops, international conferences, knowledge exchange forums). Frequently mentioned challenges to integrating social science were limited opportunities to engage across disciplines in the workplace, to interact with like-minded colleagues, and for 2-way communication and knowledge exchange between scientists and practitioners, especially given the diversity of subject matter expertise and disciplinary training of conservation professionals. The needs identified included capacity building to strengthen individual and institutional competencies, such as creating and maintaining multidisciplinary teams and professional networks, working across different organizations at multiple scales, and advancing institutional support for acceptance and validation of social science as a routine element of conservation practice, including representation of social scientists in the workforce. Steps to address such challenges can be taken along 2 pathways that conservation researchers and practitioners consistently mentioned: first, increasing conservation social science literacy through awareness building, targeted professional development training, and institutional support, and, second, fostering knowledge exchange, enhancing professional networks, and bolstering a robust community of practice across Europe.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesSocial SciencesCapacity BuildingEuropeHumansAlemaniabrecha ciencia‐prácticacapacity buildingcommunity of practicecomunidad de prácticaconservation practitionerscualitativodesarrollo de capacidadesdimensiones humanasfuerza laboralGermanyhuman dimensionspracticantes de la conservaciónqualitativescience–practice gapworkforce

Identifiers

PMID40927997
PMCPMC12451480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.