Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927968›Full record

ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Models of care for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Brenda Bongaerts, Anna Leuwer, Fayola Sadiq, Benedikt Wolters, Yang Guo, Karina Tapinova, Omolola T Alade, Heidrun Janka, Juan Va Franco

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brenda BongaertsCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4695-7185
Anna LeuwerCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Fayola SadiqCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Benedikt WoltersCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Yang GuoCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Karina TapinovaEmergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Omolola T AladeDepartment of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Heidrun JankaCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Juan Va FrancoCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to improve the outcomes of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), access to and quality of comprehensive acute and chronic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) must be improved.

objectivesTo identify and summarise the characteristics of models of care for T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC. SEARCH

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus from inception to 11 December 2023 without restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. We included all study types describing the implemented organisation (setting, healthcare facilities, financial resources) and delivery of T1DM care (treatment, self-management support, clinical monitoring) for the management of T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened and selected eligible studies, and charted relevant data from the included studies. The charted data were presented in a descriptive format. MAIN

resultsWe included 40 studies that described models for T1DM care in 19 LMICs across the different WHO regions. African Region We identified models of care in Cameroon, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, largely supported by international initiatives like Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) and Life for a Child (LFAC). Models were implemented between 2004 and 2012, and aimed to enhance infrastructure and care delivery, including access to insulin, glucose monitoring supplies, and diabetes education for patients and caregivers. Multidisciplinary teams provided care across urban and rural settings, with some countries offering tele-support and diabetes camps. Financial and logistical barriers persisted despite governmental and humanitarian support. Region of the Americas We identified models of care in Brazil and Cuba, focusing on reducing complications, training human resources, and supporting psychosocial development. In Brazil, care was delivered at a secondary-level facility by a multidisciplinary team. In Cuba, care was provided by a tertiary-level childhood diabetes clinic. Both models emphasised diabetes education for patients and families, regular specialist consultations, and community awareness initiatives. Unique features included holiday camps in Cuba and internship programs for healthcare professionals in Brazil. Diabetes care in Brazil was free, with additional resources for those in need. South-East Asia Region We identified models of care in Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, with implementation between 2009 and 2015. These models aimed to improve access to care, self-management education, and awareness amongst healthcare workers and communities, particularly for children below the poverty line. Supported by initiatives such as CDiC, LFAC, and Action4Diabetes (A4D), the models delivered outpatient care through multidisciplinary teams, providing free insulin and supplies in most countries. Regular HbA1c monitoring, diabetes education, and psychological support were key components, along with community awareness initiatives in four countries. Financial barriers remained significant, particularly in Bangladesh and Thailand. European Region We identified models of care in Kazakhstan and Turkey, aiming to provide comprehensive diabetes care and improve patient well-being. In Kazakhstan, care included free insulin, glucose meters and test strips, and a monitoring system for hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was in place. Turkey's National Childhood Diabetes Program, initiated from 1994 onwards, delivered care through multidisciplinary healthcare teams and included initiatives like the Diabetes at School Program to raise awareness. Financial barriers persisted in both countries concerning certain supplies and technologies. Eastern Mediterranean Region We identified a model of care in Morocco, implemented in 1986, that had expanded from a single tertiary-level facility to nine provincial secondary-level hospitals, covering a third of the country's young patients with T1DM. Care was delivered by multidisciplinary teams and included initial in-hospital treatment, followed by outpatient consultations every three months. Education in self-management was emphasised, with group sessions, holiday camps, and tailored resources for illiterate parents. A database system supported electronic data monitoring. Financial support was provided for low-income families through sponsors and associations, although insurance coverage was limited to insulin costs. Western Pacific Region We identified models of care for Cambodia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Laos, supported by the A4D program. T1DM care included free insulin, glucose meters, HbA1c testing, and emergency funds, with care delivered through tertiary and secondary-level facilities, except in Vietnam where a single tertiary-level clinic provided care. Multidisciplinary teams were present in Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, but not in Laos. Screening for diabetes complications varied, with the most comprehensive screening offered in Cambodia and Laos. Ongoing diabetes training for healthcare workers, and electronic patient databases were integral to the model of care. Financial barriers persisted in Laos, where certain screening assessments required out-of-pocket payment. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn many countries included in this review, substantial improvements in T1DM care have been made, particularly through international partnerships. However, the sustainability, consistency, and comprehensiveness of care remain a consistent challenge for further improving life expectancy and quality of life for children and adolescents with T1DM.

fundingWorld Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Registration: OSF, via doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentChildDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40927968
PMCPMC12421716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.