ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Multiyear Drought Strengthens Positive and Negative Functional Diversity Effects on Tree Growth Response.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydro-Functional Traits and Their Dissimilarity to the Neighbourhood Buffer Tree Growth Against the 2018-2020 Central European Drought.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Multiyear Drought Strengthens Positive and Negative Functional Diversity Effects on Tree Growth Response.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mixed-species forests are proposed to enhance tree resistance and resilience to drought. However, growing evidence shows that tree species richness does not consistently improve tree growth responses to drought. The underlying mechanisms remain uncertain, especially under unprecedented multiyear droughts. We used a network of planted tree diversity experiments to investigate how neighborhood tree diversity and species' functional traits influence individual tree responses to drought. We analyzed tree cores (948 trees across 16 species) from nine young experiments across Europe featuring tree species richness gradients (1-6 species), which experienced recent severe droughts. Radial growth response to drought was quantified as tree-ring biomass increment using X-ray computed tomography. We applied hydraulic trait-based growth models to analyze single-year drought responses across all sites and site-specific responses during consecutive drought years. Growth responses to a single-year drought were partially explained by the focal species' hydraulic safety margin (representing species' drought tolerance) and drought intensity, but were independent of neighborhood species richness. The effects of neighborhood functional diversity on growth responses shifted from positive to negative with increasing drought duration during a single growing season. Tree diversity effects on growth responses strengthened during consecutive drought years and were site-specific with contrasting directions (both positive and negative). This indicates opposing diversity effects pathways under consecutive drought events, possibly resulting from competitive release or greater water consumption in diverse mixtures. We conclude that tree diversity effects on growth under single-year droughts may differ considerably from responses to consecutive drought years. Our study highlights the need to consider trait-based approaches (specifically, hydraulic traits) and neighborhood scale processes to understand the multifaceted responses of tree mixtures under prolonged drought stress. This experimental approach provides a robust framework to test biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships relevant for young, planted forests under increased drought stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.