ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2025
Similar Outcome With Haploidentical, Matched Sibling, or Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients With Adverse-Risk TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission: A Comparative Study From the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the dismal prognosis for patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the optimal donor for those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with TP53-mutated AML who underwent first allo-HCT in CR1 between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes were compared among using a haploidentical donor (Haplo), a matched sibling donor (MSD), and a 10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD). The analysis comprised 451 patients, including 86 Haplo, 117 MSD, and 248 MUD. Patients in the three groups were transplanted during a similar period. Haplo, MSD, and MUD groups experienced similar incidences of Day 180 Grades II-IV aGVHD (30.9% vs. 23.6% vs. 28.3%), Grades III-IV aGVHD (13.6% vs. 10.1% vs. 9.1%), 2-year cGVHD (28.9.% vs. 30.9% vs. 25.6%) and extensive cGVHD (10.9% vs. 16.1% vs. 13.3%). By multivariate analysis, the outcomes were similar in the three groups. The MSD group was associated with a similar 2-year overall survival (OS: 33.9%; p = 0.799), leukemia-free survival (LFS: 30.5%; p = 0.956), relapse incidence (RI: 54.2%; p = 0.497), non-relapse mortality (NRM: 15.3%; p = 0.368), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS: 21.8%, p = 0.957) when compared with the Haplo group (2-year OS: 46.7%, LFS: 37.4%, RI: 40.8%, NRM: 21.7%, GRFS: 25.7%). The MUD group also experienced a similar 2-year OS (36.9%; p = 0.892), LFS (31%; p = 0.904), RI (50.8%; p = 0.521), NRM (18.2%; p = 0.368) and GRFS (21.9%; p = 0.383) when compared with the Haplo group. In conclusion, outcomes of patients with TP53-mutated AML undergoing allo-HCT from a haploidentical donor were comparable to those from an MSD or 10/10 MUD HCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.