ArticleRadiology advances2024
Reducing motion artifacts in craniocervical background subtraction angiography with deformable registration and unsupervised deep learning.
Article in Radiology advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PatchDSA: improving digital subtraction angiography with patch-based phase-matching in natural breathing scenarios.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Volumetric soft tissue perfusion assessment on a region basis from x-ray angiography images: Motion compensation.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In clinical practice, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) often suffers from misregistration artifact resulting from voluntary, respiratory, and cardiac motion during acquisition. Most prior efforts to register the background DSA mask to subsequent postcontrast images rely on key point registration using iterative optimization, which has limited real-time application. Purpose: Leveraging state-of-the-art, unsupervised deep learning, we aim to develop a fast, deformable registration model to substantially reduce DSA misregistration in craniocervical angiography without compromising spatial resolution or introducing new artifacts. Materials and Methods: We extend HyperMorph, an open source deep learning deformable registration framework, to reduce motion artifacts in DSA. Novel image similarity loss functions with vessel layer estimation were introduced to optimize background registration, making it robust to the variable presence of intravascular iodinated contrast. Results: A total of 516 studies with 5,240 angiographic series were collected and divided into training (5,046 series) and hold-out test (194 series) sets. Blinded algorithm rankings and Likert scores on 5-point scales (1 = worst, 5 = best) were generated by 3 practicing interventional neuroradiologists using 50 series randomly selected from the hold-out test set. Compared to traditional DSA, our learning-based background subtraction angiography (BSA) significant improved vascular fidelity (2.4 ± 0.6 for DSA vs. 3.6 ± 0.5 for BSA), subtraction artifacts (2.0 ± 0.4 for DSA vs. 3.9 ± 0.3 for BSA), and overall quality (2.1 ± 0.5 for DSA vs. 3.9 ± 0.4 for BSA) ( Conclusion: The results demonstrate that deep learning deformable registration, combined with an appropriate loss function, can significantly reduce the motion artifacts that degrade DSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.