Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927632›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025

Urinary catheters: state of the art and future perspectives - a narrative review.

Kristijan Skok, Uroš Bele, Špela Pintar, Zdenka Peršin, Katja Kuzmič, Matej Bračič, Lidija Fras Zemljič, Uroš Maver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristijan SkokDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Uroš BeleDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Špela PintarFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zdenka PeršinUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Taborska Ulica 8, SI-2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Katja KuzmičUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova Ulica 17, SI-2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Matej BračičUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova Ulica 17, SI-2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Lidija Fras ZemljičUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova Ulica 17, SI-2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Uroš MaverUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Taborska Ulica 8, SI-2000, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most frequent healthcare associated infection, arising from microbial adhesion to catheter surfaces, biofilm development, and the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance. Many publications have addressed CAUTI epidemiology, biofilm biology, or biomaterials for catheters in isolation, yet there is little literature that connects these areas into a coherent translational perspective. This review seeks to fill that gap by combining an overview of biofilm pathophysiology with recent advances in material based innovations for catheter design, including nanostructured and responsive coatings, sensor enabled systems, additive manufacturing, and three dimensional printing. Established approaches such as hydrophilic or antimicrobial impregnated catheters are considered alongside bio inspired surface textures, zwitterionic polymers, and multifunctional hydrogels. Each strategy is evaluated in terms of maturity, clinical applicability, and barriers to translation, with a focus on shifting from antibiotic dependent treatment toward prevention of biofilm formation. By bringing together knowledge from microbiology, engineering, and clinical urology, the review outlines pathways for developing the next generation of catheters that improve outcomes and reduce infection rates.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyUrinary cathetersUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID40927632
PMCPMC12414918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.