ArticleJournal of healthcare, science and the humanities
Developing an Ethical/Social Justice Surveillance System (ESJSS): A Methodological Framework.
Article in Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efforts to reduce the unequal impacts and generations of systemic disadvantage and inequality in healthcare for black and brown communities became amplified and were made more urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, public health surveillance systems have been challenged to address the vulnerabilities that residents within these environments and experiences. This paper describes the methodology used to develop a public health ethics and bioethics surveillance system grounded in empathy and care ethics. This surveillance system was designed to assess the prevalence of ethical and social justice violations relative to the COVID-19 vaccines administration. The authors describe the methods used to establish content validity of the questionnaire, evaluate the data, and compare three ethical theories (i.e., deontology, utilitarianism, and care ethics) that would best undergird public health ethics to increase health equity.
Identifiers
40927607PMC12416231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.