Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927548›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2025

The diagnostic accuracy of lymph node silicosis for pulmonary silicosis in South African gold miners.

Ntombizodwa Ndlovu, David Rees, Deepna Govind Lakhoo, Jill Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ntombizodwa NdlovuSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-0940
David ReesSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Deepna Govind LakhooNational Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jill MurraySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymph node silicosis (LNS) may be found when investigating lung and mediastinal diseases. Co-occurrence of LNS and pulmonary silicosis (PS) has been described but no studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of LNS for PS, the aim of this study. Methods: This cross-sectional study included South African miners with exclusive gold-mining employment who had autopsy examinations from 1975 to 2018. Routinely recorded pathologist-diagnosed LNS and PS and occupational histories were retrieved from the PATHAUT database. Pulmonary silicosis was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and summary diagnostic accuracy were calculated overall and by PS severity and employment duration. Results: Of the 69 802 miners, the prevalences of LNS and PS were 39.2% (n=27 373) and 17.7% (n=12 345), respectively. There were 24.1% false-positive LNS tests. Sensitivity was 85.2% (95% CI 84.6-85.6), but specificity was lower (70.7%, 95% CI 70.3-71.0). The PPV and NPV were 38.4% (95% CI 37.9-39.0) and 95.7% (95% CI 95.5-95.9), respectively. Sensitivity increased and specificity decreased with increasing employment duration. Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with LNS occurring at concentrations of respirable crystalline silica too low to cause PS and possibly being a portent of PS. LNS had deficits as a diagnostic test for PS. The low PPV raises uncertainty about the presence of PS in patients with LNS. LNS may perform better in populations with higher prevalence of silicosis, for example in patients with clinically suspected PS.

Identifiers

PMID40927548
PMCPMC12415718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.