ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Prediction of lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma using a PET/CT radiomics-based ensemble learning model and its pathological basis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important factor affecting the stage and prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study is to explore the predictive value of the stacking ensemble learning model based on Methods: Ninety patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into the training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Stacking ensemble learning models were developed based on radiomic features combined with clinical risk factors. The predictive performance of each model was assessed through area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, Spearman's correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between features predicting LNM and pathological features. Results: Multifactorial logistic regression identified the bronchial cut-off sign and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as clinical risk factors. The Stacking-combined model demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy compared with logistic regression, random forest, and naive Bayes-combined models, with AUC values of 0.971 and 0.901 in the training and testing sets, respectively. Despite the absence of FDR-significant radiomic-pathomic correlations (all Conclusions: The stacking ensemble learning model based on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.