ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Beyond the Algorithm: A Perspective on Tackling Bias and Cultural Sensitivity in AI-Guided Aesthetic Standards for Cosmetic Surgery in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Algorithm for the Measurement of Facial First Impressions.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Training AI Models for Aesthetic Facial Evaluation: Focused Review and Framework to Mitigate Homogenizing Bias.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Facial Aesthetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping cosmetic surgery by enhancing surgical planning, predicting outcomes, and enabling objective aesthetic assessment. Through narrative synthesis of existing literature and case studies, this perspective paper explores the issue of algorithmic bias in AI-powered aesthetic technologies and presents a framework for culturally sensitive application within cosmetic surgery practices in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Existing AI systems are predominantly trained on datasets that underrepresent MENA phenotypes, resulting in aesthetic recommendations that disproportionately reflect Western beauty ideals. The MENA region, however, encompasses a broad spectrum of beauty standards that merge traditional cultural aesthetics with modern global trends, posing unique challenges for AI integration. To ensure ethical and clinically relevant deployment, AI systems must undergo fundamental changes in algorithm design, including the incorporation of culturally diverse datasets with adequate MENA representation, implementation of cultural competency principles, and active collaboration with regional healthcare professionals. The framework outlines concrete criteria for evaluating cultural representativeness in AI training data and outcome assessments, supporting future empirical validation. Developing culturally aware AI tools is both a moral obligation and a clinical priority. This framework provides both a moral imperative and clinical pathway for ensuring AI serves to support, rather than homogenize, the region's diverse aesthetic traditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.