Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927445›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025

Shock epidemiology and outcomes among internal medicine patients.

C Maluangnon, B Joyjumroon, C Phawanawichian, S Tongyoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C MaluangnonDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
B JoyjumroonDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
C PhawanawichianDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
S TongyooDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shock, characterised by circulatory hypoperfusion and cellular hypoxia, represents a critical medical condition requiring immediate attention. Despite its significance, there are limited data on shock incidence and outcomes, particularly within the context of Thailand. Objectives: This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the incidence, management and outcomes of shock patients admitted to the internal medicine department of Siriraj Hospital, a referral university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Additionally, the study sought to identify factors associated with mortality among these patients. Methods: Medical records of patients admitted were reviewed. Shock cases were identified based on specific diagnostic criteria, and demographic and clinical data were extracted for analysis. Results: A total of 125 patients were included in the study, with septic shock being the most prevalent condition (40.0%), followed by cardiogenic shock (39.2%), hypovolaemic shock (18.4%) and obstructive shock (2.4%). The overall intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate was 46.7%, varying among shock types, with cardiogenic shock patients exhibiting the highest rate. The overall 28-day mortality rate was 23.7%, with septic shock patients admitted to the ICU demonstrating the highest mortality rate (50.0%). The multivariate analysis identified factors associated with mortality, including colloid resuscitation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.10 (1.08 - 8.9), p=0.036); vasopressor dose of more than 0.2 µg/kg/min (aOR 4.38 (1.39 - 13.74), p=0.011); and renal replacement therapy (aOR 3.43 (1.04 - 11.28), p=0.043). Conclusion: This study provides significant insights into shock incidence, management and outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand. It also highlights challenges related to ICU bed availability and identifies predictors of mortality. Early recognition and tailored interventions are crucial for improving outcomes in shock patients. Contribution of the study: This study provides the comprehensive evaluation of shock incidence, management and outcomes among internal medicine patients. By identifying critical care resource limitations and key predictors of mortality, the findings offer valuable insights for improving early recognition and tailored interventions in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockhypovolaemic shockseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID40927445
PMCPMC12416926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.