ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025
Shock epidemiology and outcomes among internal medicine patients.
Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HA-330 hemoadsorption in septic shock requiring high-dose norepinephrine: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (CLEANSE).Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- The Effectiveness of Methylene Blue in Adult Shock: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shock, characterised by circulatory hypoperfusion and cellular hypoxia, represents a critical medical condition requiring immediate attention. Despite its significance, there are limited data on shock incidence and outcomes, particularly within the context of Thailand. Objectives: This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the incidence, management and outcomes of shock patients admitted to the internal medicine department of Siriraj Hospital, a referral university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Additionally, the study sought to identify factors associated with mortality among these patients. Methods: Medical records of patients admitted were reviewed. Shock cases were identified based on specific diagnostic criteria, and demographic and clinical data were extracted for analysis. Results: A total of 125 patients were included in the study, with septic shock being the most prevalent condition (40.0%), followed by cardiogenic shock (39.2%), hypovolaemic shock (18.4%) and obstructive shock (2.4%). The overall intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate was 46.7%, varying among shock types, with cardiogenic shock patients exhibiting the highest rate. The overall 28-day mortality rate was 23.7%, with septic shock patients admitted to the ICU demonstrating the highest mortality rate (50.0%). The multivariate analysis identified factors associated with mortality, including colloid resuscitation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.10 (1.08 - 8.9), p=0.036); vasopressor dose of more than 0.2 µg/kg/min (aOR 4.38 (1.39 - 13.74), p=0.011); and renal replacement therapy (aOR 3.43 (1.04 - 11.28), p=0.043). Conclusion: This study provides significant insights into shock incidence, management and outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand. It also highlights challenges related to ICU bed availability and identifies predictors of mortality. Early recognition and tailored interventions are crucial for improving outcomes in shock patients. Contribution of the study: This study provides the comprehensive evaluation of shock incidence, management and outcomes among internal medicine patients. By identifying critical care resource limitations and key predictors of mortality, the findings offer valuable insights for improving early recognition and tailored interventions in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.