ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
The role of spatial perception in auditory looming bias: neurobehavioral evidence from impossible ears.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic processing and individual suggestibility modulate motor preparation and perceived distance for looming sounds entering the peripersonal space.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An illustrative guide to expressing cognitive theories using evidence accumulation modelling.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Threat-related corticocortical connectivity elicited by rapid auditory looms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spatial hearing enables both voluntary localization of sound sources and automatic monitoring of the surroundings. The auditory looming bias (ALB), characterized by the prioritized processing of approaching (looming) sounds over receding ones, is thought to serve as an early hazard detection mechanism. The bias could theoretically reflect an adaptation to the low-level acoustic properties of approaching sounds, or alternatively necessitate the sound to be localizable in space. Methods: To investigate whether ALB reflects spatial perceptual decisions or mere acoustic changes, we simulated ears that disrupted spectrospatial associations on the perceptual level while maintaining the original spectrospatial entropy on the acoustic level. We then assessed sound localization, ALB and distance ratings. Results: Compared to native ears, these novel ears impaired sound localization in both the direction and ego-centric distance dimensions. ALB manifestation also differed significantly between native and novel ears, as evidenced by behavioral discrimination performance and early cortical activity (N1 latency). Notably, the N1 electroencephalographic response closely resembled distance ratings, suggesting a strong link between spatial perception and ALB-related neural processing. Integrating this neural marker into a hierarchical perceptual decision-making model improved explanatory power, underscoring its behavioral relevance. Discussion: These findings suggest a strong link between the localizability of sounds and their ability to elicit ALB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.