ArticlePreventive oncology & epidemiology2025
Approaches to address common barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural communities of the CDC's colorectal cancer control program.
Article in Preventive oncology & epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: We identified potential approaches to address barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in rural communities of award recipients from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). Methods: Nine program managers and directors discussed approaches to address barriers to CRC screening. The programs served areas with rural communities and tribal reservations. Participants participated in five monthly web-based meetings and completed questionnaires regarding the use and usefulness of approaches. We conducted two focus groups with award recipients' partners to validate the approaches. Results: Participants indicated that patient reminders, small media, and translated materials were useful in increasing uptake. There were six approaches that all programs used and agreed were useful for providers, including creating standard operating procedures and promoting stool-based testing. There was more variation on usefulness at the health system level, but all programs used and agreed standing orders for stool-based tests were useful. Discussion: Through discussions, questionnaires, and focus groups with participants, we found that many of the approaches to overcoming barriers in rural areas focused on aiding patients in accessing screening and automating procedures to mitigate the impacts of staff and provider turnover. Further evaluation can determine effective, sustainable and cost-effective approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.