ArticlePreventive oncology & epidemiology2025
Promising approaches to support sustained colorectal cancer screening promotion strategies in primary care clinics.
Article in Preventive oncology & epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) funds recipients to partner with primary care clinics to adopt and sustain evidence-based interventions (EBIs) that increase CRC screening. This qualitative study explored how CRCCP recipients support their clinic partners to sustain EBI implementation. Materials and methods: Two waves of data collection - including 27 key informant interviews and 4 validation focus groups with CRCCP recipients - explored recipients' preparation for partnering with potential clinics and supporting EBI implementation and sustainment. Thematic analysis identified support strategies used throughout the CRCCP lifespan. Result: To prepare for partnerships with clinics, recipients assessed organizational characteristics (leadership support, staffing, and data capacity) to determine readiness for implementing and sustaining EBIs. Recipients then: provided funding for implementation support, and ongoing training and technical assistance; established a clinic-level screening champion; and integrated EBIs into clinic workflows. Some recipients continue to partner with clinics after EBIs are sustained to monitor CRC screening rates and fund follow-up colonoscopies. Discussion: Study findings indicate that assessing organizational characteristics to determine readiness and providing funding and ongoing technical assistance are practical approaches to support CRC EBI sustainment. Results can inform program and partnership planning among CRCCP recipients and other cancer screening and chronic disease prevention programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.