Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927396›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

Perceptions of positive and negative clinician communication in obstetrical visits from the perspectives of pregnant patients who use substances.

Abisola Olaniyan, Mary Hawk, Dara D Mendez, Steven M Albert, Natalie Stern, Sneha Patnaik, Judy C Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abisola OlaniyanDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mary HawkDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dara D MendezDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Steven M AlbertDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Natalie SternDepartment of Obstetrics, & Reproductive Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Gynecology Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sneha PatnaikDepartment of Obstetrics, & Reproductive Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Gynecology Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Judy C ChangDepartment of Obstetrics, & Reproductive Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Gynecology Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the perceptions of pregnant patients who use substances regarding positive or negative clinician communication during obstetrical care. Methods: We analyzed qualitative data from 85 semi-structured interviews with pregnant patients who reported or tested positive for substance use, which explored their interaction with obstetric providers during their first prenatal visit. This analysis focuses on patients' perceptions of negative versus positive clinician communication behaviors. Results: Eighty-five participants described clinician communication behaviors they felt affected their feelings about the clinician and their willingness to talk about prenatal substance use and other sensitive topics. Negative behaviors included clinicians (1) expressing judgment, (2) rushing through the consultation and providing limited information to patients, and (3) using statements or behaviors that made patients feel dehumanized. Positive behaviors included clinicians (1) explicitly expressing care for the patient, (2) creating rapport by soliciting patient stories and building relationships, and (3) demonstrating attentive listening. Innovation: To our knowledge, our study is the first to explore clinician communication behavior with a focus on prenatal substance use from the perspective of pregnant people using substances. Conclusion: Our findings highlight pregnant patients' perspectives on communication patterns that could improve patient-clinician interactions and, in turn, maternal health care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Negative clinician communicationPatient-clinician communicationPositive clinician communicationPrenatal carePrenatal substance use

Identifiers

PMID40927396
PMCPMC12416091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.