ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Brain network of athletes in motor imagery and action anticipation: an ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG coherence signatures of sport-specific motor imagery in elite freestyle skiing aerials athletes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Visio-spatial intelligence in athletes: comparison of field hockey players and non-athletes.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Article
- Visual Imagery and Spectrum Symptoms of Depression and Hypomania Differentially Modulate Brain Responses during Emotional Face Anticipation and Encoding.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how athletes mentally simulate and anticipate actions provides key insights into experience-driven brain plasticity. While previous studies have investigated motor imagery and action anticipation separately, little is known about how their underlying neural mechanisms converge or diverge in expert performers. This study conducted a meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) and meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) to compare brain activation patterns between athletes and non-athletes across both tasks. We systematically reviewed functional magnetic resonance imaging studies and included 20 eligible studies. ALE was used to identify consistent activation patterns, followed by contrast and conjunction analyses. MACM was used to further explored connectivity among key brain regions. Results showed that athletes exhibited stronger activation in the left middle and precentral gyrus during motor imagery, and in the superior frontal gyrus, bilateral precentral gyrus, and right middle frontal gyrus during action anticipation. Non-athletes showed greater activation in visual regions such as the middle occipital gyrus. Connectivity analyses revealed that athletes formed a cohesive fronto-parietal-temporal network integrating motor imagery and action prediction, which was not observed in non-athletes. These findings highlight a nested and efficient action observation network in athletes, supporting the integration of internally generated and externally guided action processes. This work advances models of perceptual-motor expertise and provides insight into how long-term sports training modulates brain plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.