Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927346›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The interaction of online co-creative performance in a paired-player mode with creative tendency as a moderator.

Ching-Lin Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ching-Lin WuProgram of Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the moderating effect of individuals' creative tendencies on their creative performance in interactive situations. A sample of 292 participants was selected to engage in various assessments, including the Alternative Uses Test (AUT) and the Chinese Radical Remote Associates Test (CRRAT) in single-player and paired-player modes. Additionally, participants completed the Creative Tendency Scale (CTS) as part of the data collection process. The collected performance data were used to analyze whether the creative performance of groups with different creative thinking abilities in interactive situations was moderated by creative tendency. The results revealed that risk-taking, curiosity, and total score for creative tendency moderated the relationship between CRRAT performance in single- and paired-player modes. In the context of high risk-taking, curiosity, and total score for creative tendency, the high- and low-scoring CRRAT groups showed no significant differences in their CRRAT performance in the paired-player mode. Moreover, creative tendency did not moderate the relationship between divergent thinking performance in the single- and paired-player modes. Overall, this study distinguishes the impact of creative tendency on the relationship between two types of creative problem-solving (i.e., AUT and CRRAT) in single- and paired-player modes, deepening our understanding of the connection between the cognitive and affective aspects of creativity in different contexts and how individuals exhibit their creativity in one-on-one interactive situations.

Indexed as

Chinese Radical Remote Associates Test (CRRAT)creative tendencydivergent thinkingmoderationonline creativity taskRemote Associates Test (RAT)

Identifiers

PMID40927346
PMCPMC12414734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.