Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927324›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Simple Bagged Movement Models for Telemetry Data.

Andrew B Whetten, Trevor J Hefley, David A Haukos, Dustin E Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew B WhettenDepartment of Statistics Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-8541
Trevor J HefleyDepartment of Statistics Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA.
David A HaukosU.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA.
Dustin E BrewerSchool of Natural Resources Lake Superior State University Sault Sainte Marie Michigan USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining which statistical methods are appropriate for data is both user and data dependent and prone to change as new methodology becomes available. This process encompasses model ideation, model selection, and determining appropriate use of statistical methods. Literature on models for animal movement emerging in the past two decades has yielded a rich collection of statistical methods garnering much deserved positive attention. Among such efforts, there is limited investigation of the broader place for simple machine learning methodology in animal movement modeling. We propose a bagged (i.e., bootstrap aggregated) animal movement model using simple, off-the-shelf machine learning algorithms. The model is intuitive, retains statistical inference about characteristics of animal movement (i.e., estimated from model-based summary statistics), and only requires knowledge of elementary statistical and machine learning analysis to understand. We show by simulation that our model can provide unbiased estimates of pertinent characteristics of animal movement (e.g., daily displacement) in the presence of large and realistic location error. We believe that increasing accessible literature on simple machine learning animal movement models provides valuable pedagogical and practical support for researchers using statistical models to study animal movement.

Indexed as

animal movementanimal movement modelsbaggingbootstrapensembleking railmachine learningmovement ecologymule deertelemetry data

Identifiers

PMID40927324
PMCPMC12414728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.