ArticleBJUI compass2025
Development of a novel risk model to predict CRPC progression following IMRT: Implications for tailoring treatment intensity.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic factors and the role of pelvic lymph node dissection in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a multicenter exploratory study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Development of a novel risk model to predict CRPC progression following IMRT: Implications for tailoring treatment intensity.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a novel risk score (RS) model to predict the probability of progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) (CRPC) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification, since accurate prediction of the clinical outcome of definitive radiation therapy for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa remains challenging due to its heterogeneity. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 600 patients with high- and very high-risk PCa treated with IMRT at our institution. They were randomly divided into discovery (n = 300) and validation (n = 300) cohorts. A predictive RS model was created using a dataset from the discovery cohort based on the following parameters: T-stage, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen and age at initiation of IMRT. The model was internally validated using a dataset from the validation cohort. RS was calculated using multivariable Cox regression analysis, and patients were categorized into low-risk, intermediate-risk or high-risk based on the value. Results: The median follow-up period of the 600 patients was 9.1 (IQR: 6.1-11.6) years. The 10-year CRPC-free rates for low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories were 100.0, 90.4 and 61.4% in the discovery cohort, respectively (p < 0.001). Such differences were reproduced in the validation cohort. Specifically, those rates for low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories were 96.4, 90.7 and 74.8% in the validation cohort, respectively (p < 0.001). Harrell's C-index for this model was 0.692, being higher than that of the NCCN risk classification (0.617). Conclusion: This RS model provided useful information to enable tailoring of the treatment intensity for this heterogeneous population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.