ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
Morning administration of anthracyclines is associated with a lower risk of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chronotherapy in Hematological Malignancies: Evaluating the Rationale and Evidence.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Pre-clinical studies point towards an administration time-dependency of anthracycline-induced cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between time-of-day of AC administration and CTRCD. Methods and results: Patients from two cardio-oncology outpatient clinics, treated with ACs for any malignancy, were included. Percentage of afternoon AC administration was calculated: cumulative dose administered in the afternoon (12 p.m.-11:59 p.m.)/total cumulative dose. Three groups were defined: morning group ≥ 50% of ACs in the morning (12 a.m.-11:59 a.m.), afternoon group ≥ 50% of ACs in the afternoon, and intermediate group = exactly 50% of ACs in the morning and afternoon. Associations between AC timing and occurrence of CTRCD and heart failure (HF) were assessed using survival analyses. Of 270 included patients, 66 developed CTRCD and 17 developed HF. Compared with the morning group, the afternoon group had a higher risk of developing CTRCD: hazard ratio (HR) 2.88 (95% CI: 1.52-5.44). When considering percentage of ACs administered in the afternoon as a continuous variable, the HR for developing CTRCD was 1.14 (95% CI: 1.04-1.24) for each subsequent 10% of afternoon administration. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses of age, sex, body mass index, malignancy type, cumulative AC dose, and HFA-ICOS risk score. Congruently, the continuous variable of afternoon AC administration was associated with higher risk of HF: HR = 1.19 (95% CI: 1.01-1.41). Conclusion: Afternoon administration of ACs is associated with an increased risk of developing CTRCD and HF, suggesting that morning administration may be preferred. Before widespread implementation, these findings should be confirmed in an RCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.