Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927252›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)

Beyond Difficult Discussions: Six Tools for Debriefing Tender Conversations in Healthcare.

Matthew Bowker, Amy Younger, Amy Huggin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew BowkerNewcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.
Amy YoungerNewcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6531-5251
Amy HugginNewcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whilst debriefing literature offers valuable tools for healthcare education, there remains a gap in resources specifically designed for debriefing communication skills. Effective communication is fundamental to patient care, particularly during sensitive interactions. This article provides a specialised toolkit for educators to enhance communication skills debriefing, developed through synthesis of existing literature and the authors' extensive experience teaching communication skills through simulation. Methods: Drawing from literature and the authors' extensive experience teaching communication skills through simulation, we present six interconnected tools: leveraging cognitive dissonance, recognising micro-ruptures in rapport, mapping communication to clinical reasoning, differentiating sincere from performative empathy, metaphor dissection (analysis of the implicit meanings in patients' figurative language), and emotional labour accounting (the work of managing displayed emotions in professional contexts). We demonstrate these concepts through a fictional case study of Dr Morton's interactions with a patient and family. Results: The toolkit offers specific debriefing questions for each component that encourage reflective practice. Cognitive dissonance exploration helps clinicians recognise when competing professional values affect communication. Micro-rupture identification aids in preserving therapeutic relationships. Communication mapping enhances clinical decision-making. Understanding different forms of empathy guides appropriate engagement. Metaphor analysis reveals hidden meanings in patient-clinician dialogues. Emotional labour accounting acknowledges the personal cost of managing emotions professionally. Together, these elements create a framework that strengthens communication effectiveness whilst supporting clinician wellbeing. Conclusions: Effective debriefing of communication skills requires attention to both technical and emotional dimensions of healthcare interactions. This toolkit provides practical strategies for educators to help learners navigate the complexities of healthcare communication, ultimately improving patient care whilst supporting clinician resilience.

Indexed as

bad newscommunicationdebriefingsimulation

Identifiers

PMID40927252
PMCPMC12416291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.