Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927177›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Mastering the art of sectioning: a comprehensive guide to slide-microtome technology and histological applications.

Yasmin M Abd El-Aziz, Mohammed S Sobh, Hebatallah M Saad, Menna H E Morsy, Ehab El-Haroun, Kasim Sakran Abass, Zulhisyam Abdul Kari, Roshmon Thomas Mathew, Moaheda E H Eissa, El-Sayed Hemdan Eissa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reproductive and immune-related consequences ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yasmin M Abd El-AzizDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt.
Mohammed S SobhPathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Hebatallah M SaadPathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Matrouh University, Marsa Matruh, Egypt.
Menna H E MorsyZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Arish University, Arish, Egypt.
Ehab El-HarounDepartment of Integrative Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Kasim Sakran AbassDepartment of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq.
Zulhisyam Abdul KariDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Malaysia.
Roshmon Thomas MathewFish Resources Research Center, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Moaheda E H EissaBiotechnology Department, Fish Farming and Technology Institute, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
El-Sayed Hemdan EissaFish Research Centre, Faculty of Environmental Agricultural Sciences, Arish University, El Arish, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The well-known technique of microtomy, which is an essential cutting tool, was first developed for light and transmission electron microscope uses, but it is currently also utilized to prepare specimens for atomic force microscopy (AFM), ion microscopy using a focused ion beam (FIB), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Ultramicrotomy can only be used on soft substances and metals that are sufficiently ductile to be cut with a diamond knife. Before being sliced by a microtome, many soft materials must first go through numerous preparatory processes. The choice of microtome type and blade material depends on the specimen being cut and the desired thickness of the sections. The scope of this review is to provide an overview of the main types of microtomes and a comparison between various common types of microtomes, recognizing and classifying frequent difficulties in tissue sample preparation with a particular emphasis on sectioning and staining problems. This review will put your focus on some problems, such as thick section borders, prolonged fixation or excess aldehyde concentration, low ethanol concentration or incomplete fixation, and sections not sticking to slides, especially during staining. In addition, explaining the artifacts during the processing of specimens using a microtome along with discussing the applications, calibration, maintenance of the microtome, as well as its troubleshooting, in addition to future trends, as well as challenges for this tool. Studying these issues will elevate key insights regarding the necessity of exact fixation, temperature control, accurate sectioning techniques, and gentle handling of tissues for the quality of histological samples used for microscopic studies.

Indexed as

artifactsbladesmicrotome typessectioning techniquesslidestissue preparation

Identifiers

PMID40927177
PMCPMC12414758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.