Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927174›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Analytical validation of a flow cytometric method for the detection and quantification of canine mast cells in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node.

Giulia Iamone, Fulvio Riondato, Rachel Hanford, Amandine Lejeune, Amir Kol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia IamoneDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Fulvio RiondatoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Rachel HanfordDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.
Amandine LejeuneDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.
Amir KolDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mast cell tumors (MCTs) are the most common skin neoplasms in dogs and exhibit highly variable biological behavior. Metastasis primarily affects the lymph nodes, though less frequently, MCTs can infiltrate the spleen, liver, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. Flow cytometry of fine needle aspirate samples represents a non-invasive diagnostic procedure that has shown promise for detecting and quantifying mast cells in primary tumors and lymph nodes. However, analytical validation of this method for clinical use is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of a flow cytometric panel for quantifying mast cells in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node aspirates from dogs. Key parameters as the limit of blank (LOB), lower limit of detection (LLoD), lower limit of quantification (LLoQ), intra-assay precision, and accuracy, were evaluated. The method demonstrated high precision across a wide range of mast cell concentrations, with analytical coefficient of variation (CV

Indexed as

analytical validationbone marrowcanineflow cytometrylymph nodesmast cell tumormetastasisperipheral blood

Identifiers

PMID40927174
PMCPMC12414779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.