ArticleRevista Cuidarte
Self-management experience in adults with colostomies due to colorectal cancer.
Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peer-Support Interventions for Self-Management in Adults Living with an Intestinal Ostomy: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Where healthcare systems fall short in long-term ostomy care: implications for quality of life, healthcare utilization, and sustainable care pathways.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Facing a chronic disease such as colorectal cancer with a colostomy is a process that represents changes in people's quality of life. Addressing this experience is an enriching process that strengthens self-management interventions. Objective: To describe the self-management experience of adults with colostomy due to colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A qualitative study with a descriptive phenomenological approach was conducted. Ten people over 18 years of age with colorectal cancer with temporary or permanent colostomies of at least 6 months' evolution participated voluntarily in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using the Colaizzi analysis method. Results: Eight categories are associated with the phenomenon, and thirty nominal codes represent the experience. The spiritual dimension, social support, coping with colostomy-related difficulties, and experiencing psychosocial changes were identified as factors that influence self-management, as well as practices and behaviors, such as self-management skills, living a new reality, adapting to the colostomy, and support and learning from the healthcare team and system. Discussion: The difficulties experienced, family and social support, social effects, and spiritual support are consistent with the literature. This research highlights the difficulties with access to supplies, helping others, nicknaming the stoma, and the interactions with the health system. Conclusion: Knowing the self-management experience, influencing factors, and practices contributes to implementing interventions with a better impact aimed at improving the quality of life and the new life experience of having a colostomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.