Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927115›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Comparative Validation of MOPTIM MRT-200 Refraction Device with 2WIN and Retinomax.

Heidi Schumacher, Giancarlo Garaygay, Aana Ayagalria, Bryant Ikaika Lauano, Denise M Marshall, J Richard Townley, Robert W Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heidi SchumacherAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Giancarlo GaraygayAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Aana AyagalriaAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Bryant Ikaika LauanoAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Denise M MarshallAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
J Richard TownleyAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Robert W ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-7717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Portable sphero-cylinder refraction is useful for remote medical missions and self-checking. A novel, inexpensive, handheld optical scope with an internal vision chart and adjustable diopter lens, called the Moptim MRT-200, was therefore validated. Methods: Young, capable patients from a pediatric eye practice had dry refraction estimates with the Moptim MRT-200, Adaptica 2WIN photoscreener, and Monocular Retinomax compared with actual refined retinoscopy. Vector-converted sphero-cylinder refractions and the univariate ABCD Ellipsoid were used for comparison as well as monocular visual acuity. Results: 206 racially diverse, high-risk refractive patients with median "Ellipsoid-Gap" of 3.5 had high correlation spherical equivalent and similar ABCD Ellipsoid comparing Moptim MRT-200, 2WIN and Retinomax (Kruskal Wallis X Conclusion: Precise sphero-cylinder estimation with the Moptim MRT-200 was too complex for lay screeners and many young patients, especially compared to 2WIN and Retinomax; however, rapid estimation of spherical refraction was feasible and valid.

Indexed as

portable refractionrefractive comparisonself-diagnosisvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID40927115
PMCPMC12415116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.