Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927114›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Efficacy of Spectacle Correction Using Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments in the Myopic Population.

Marketa Zakova, Martin Fus, Leos Tejkl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marketa ZakovaFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-0119
Martin FusFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3245-4544
Leos TejklFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DIMS (Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments) in comparison to control group (CTRL) in a wide age group of European progressive myopes (6-26 years). Methods: In this prospective, non-randomised observational study, 78 myopes with progression myopia to -0.25 to -8.5 D and astigmatism to -0.25 to -2.25 D chose DIMS (n=54) or single vision lenses (SV) (n=24). Baseline measurements included spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and axial length (AL), evaluated at regular intervals. Results: In participants younger than 15 years of age, slower progression of myopia (SER) (SER -0.25±0.35 D) and reduced axial elongation (0.09 ± 0.16 mm) was observed in Group 1 (DIMS) compared to Group 2 (CTRL) (SER -0.73 ± 0.57 D, AL 0.30 ± 0.20 mm), both significantly at p-value <0.05. In participants over 15 years of age, Group 3 (DIMS) exhibited minimal myopia progression (SER -0.24 ± 0.29D) and negligible axial elongation (0.00 ± 0.07 mm), Group 4 (CTRL) demonstrated more pronounced axial elongation (SER -0.20 ± 0.53D, AL 0.01 ± 0.06 mm). Conclusion: It can be stated that the DIMS variant is 68.7% more effective in the category of subjects younger than 15 years of age in the effect on AL and 65.6% more effective in the effect on SER compared to the SV lenses. This deceleration in myopia progression is statistically significant in the under 15 age group. A statistically significant difference in the effect on SER in this age group was observed for DIMS.

Indexed as

DIMSmyopiamyopia control

Identifiers

PMID40927114
PMCPMC12416392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.