ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Factors Affecting the Quality of Non-contrast Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Images: Challenges and Change.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Large-area flat-panel detector versus conventional detector for full-spine digital radiography: a retrospective comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the main cause of mortality worldwide, with coronary artery disease (CAD) noted as one of the major causes of CVD. An early and accurate diagnosis is important for improved outcomes in CAD patients. Invasive coronary angiography and coronary computed tomography angiography are accurate diagnostic tools for CAD. However, these examination methods possess limitations, including invasiveness and use of ionizing radiation, which limit their application in certain population groups. Meanwhile, coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) represents a noninvasive method that provides high-resolution coronary artery images without ionizing radiation and contrast agents. Nonetheless, the quality of CMRA images depends on numerous physiological and technical factors. This review analyzes the main factors that affect CMRA image quality and provides theoretical and technical insights for better clinical application of CMRA in CAD diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.