Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927097›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Artificial Intelligence in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications and Future Directions.

Ibrahim Antoun, Ali Nizam, Armia Ebeid, Mariya Rajesh, Ahmed Abdelrazik, Mahmoud Eldesouky, Kaung Myat Thu, Joseph Barker, Georgia R Layton, Mustafa Zakkar and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beyond the Biopsy: Imaging Frontiers in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  9. Who will be our adult congenital heart disease patient tomorrow?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ibrahim AntounDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-7476
Ali NizamDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Science Wing, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Armia EbeidDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Science Wing, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Mariya RajeshDepartment of Acute Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA 6150, Australia.
Ahmed AbdelrazikDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Science Wing, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Mahmoud EldesoukyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Science Wing, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Kaung Myat ThuDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Joseph BarkerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, SW3 6LY London, UK.
Georgia R LaytonDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-0559
Mustafa ZakkarDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Mokhtar IbrahimDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Kassem SafwanDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-9502
Radek M DibekDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Riyaz SomaniDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5162-3644
G André NgDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5965-0671
Aiden BolgerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) constitutes a heterogeneous and expanding patient cohort with distinctive diagnostic and management challenges. Conventional detection methods are ineffective at reflecting lesion heterogeneity and the variability in risk profiles. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, has revolutionized the potential for improving diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized care across the ACHD spectrum. This narrative review discusses the current and future applications of AI in ACHD, including imaging interpretation, electrocardiographic analysis, risk stratification, procedural planning, and long-term care management. AI has been demonstrated as being highly accurate in congenital anomaly detection by various imaging modalities, automating measurement, and improving diagnostic consistency. Moreover, AI has been utilized in electrocardiography to detect previously undetected defects and estimate arrhythmia risk. Risk-prediction models based on clinical and imaging information can estimate stroke, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death as outcomes, thereby informing personalized therapy choices. AI also contributes to surgery and interventional planning through three-dimensional (3D) modelling and image fusion, while AI-powered remote monitoring tools enable the detection of early signals of clinical deterioration. While these insights are encouraging, limitations in data availability, algorithmic bias, a lack of prospective validation, and integration issues remain to be addressed. Ethical considerations of transparency, privacy, and responsibility should also be highlighted. Thus, future initiatives should prioritize data sharing, explainability, and clinician training to facilitate the secure and effective use of AI. The appropriate integration of AI can enhance decision-making, improve efficiency, and deliver individualized, high-quality care to ACHD patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecongenital heart diseaseECGmachine learningpersonalised medicineremote monitoringrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40927097
PMCPMC12415737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.