ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Artificial Intelligence in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications and Future Directions.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Hypertension Persistence in Coarctation of the Aorta: A Feasibility Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Superior vena cava perforation during atrial lead implantation in a patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- A narrative review on the use of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence, extended reality and computational modelling in cross-sectional cardiovascular imaging in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Enabled Noninvasive Mapping of Cardiac Arrhythmia Origins Using the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Using Orbital Atherectomy in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report From a Nonsurgical Centre.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
- Beyond the Biopsy: Imaging Frontiers in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Who will be our adult congenital heart disease patient tomorrow?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Diagnostics, Monitoring, and Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) constitutes a heterogeneous and expanding patient cohort with distinctive diagnostic and management challenges. Conventional detection methods are ineffective at reflecting lesion heterogeneity and the variability in risk profiles. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, has revolutionized the potential for improving diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized care across the ACHD spectrum. This narrative review discusses the current and future applications of AI in ACHD, including imaging interpretation, electrocardiographic analysis, risk stratification, procedural planning, and long-term care management. AI has been demonstrated as being highly accurate in congenital anomaly detection by various imaging modalities, automating measurement, and improving diagnostic consistency. Moreover, AI has been utilized in electrocardiography to detect previously undetected defects and estimate arrhythmia risk. Risk-prediction models based on clinical and imaging information can estimate stroke, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death as outcomes, thereby informing personalized therapy choices. AI also contributes to surgery and interventional planning through three-dimensional (3D) modelling and image fusion, while AI-powered remote monitoring tools enable the detection of early signals of clinical deterioration. While these insights are encouraging, limitations in data availability, algorithmic bias, a lack of prospective validation, and integration issues remain to be addressed. Ethical considerations of transparency, privacy, and responsibility should also be highlighted. Thus, future initiatives should prioritize data sharing, explainability, and clinician training to facilitate the secure and effective use of AI. The appropriate integration of AI can enhance decision-making, improve efficiency, and deliver individualized, high-quality care to ACHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.