Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40927073›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025

Comparison of EEG Burst Suppression and Hemodynamic Effects Between Remimazolam Tosilate and Etomidate During General Anesthesia Induction: A Retrospective Analysis.

Ying Cao, Mi Gan, Linling Wan, Jun Lu, Ting Liu, Meiyan Liu, Di Wang, Sen Hong, Lin Zhou, Luying Deng and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ying Cao *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-1039
Mi Gan *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Linling Wan *Chongqing Population and Family Planning Science and Technology Research Institute, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Jun LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Ting LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-7214-7973
Meiyan LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Di WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Sen HongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Lin ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Luying DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Zijun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Jingjie WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Changyu SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Yanqiu LiuSchool of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Meiwu ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam tosilate, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, demonstrates promising safety profiles in clinical settings. While both remimazolam tosilate and etomidate provide hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction, limited research has directly compared their effects on electroencephalogram (EEG) burst suppression (periods of transient brain wave silence), a potential predictor of adverse neurological outcomes. This study aims to compare the incidence rate of EEG burst suppression (ESR) with remimazolam tosilate versus etomidate by reviewing the drug regimens used by different anesthesiologists in clinical practice. Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed clinical anesthesia induction data from 161 patients from October 2023 to July 2024. Patients received either remimazolam tosilate (0.2 mg/kg, n=86, Group R) or etomidate (0.3 mg/kg, n=75, Group E) for general anesthesia induction. Primary outcomes included ESR and its duration during induction. Second outcomes comprised hemodynamic parameters: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, measured at baseline (T0), 3 minutes post-induction (T1), immediately after intubation (T2), 5 minutes post-intubation (T3), 10 minutes post-intubation (T4), and adverse events occurrence. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable except ASA classification (higher ASA III proportion in Group R: 24.4% vs 2.7%, P<0.001). No ESR occurred in Group R versus 29.34% in Group E (P<0.01). Group R had a significantly lower incidence of intubation-related hypertension (10.5% vs 42.7%, P<0.001) and maintained stable blood pressure and HR throughout induction, whereas Group E exhibited marked MAP and HR fluctuations. Other adverse events showed no significant inter-group differences. Conclusion: Remimazolam tosilate demonstrated notable differences compared to etomidate during general anesthesia induction, including the absence of ESR and different hemodynamic response patterns. While these findings suggest potential advantages for certain patient populations, the retrospective design and ASA classification imbalance limit definitive conclusions, warranting prospective validation studies.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesElectroencephalographyEtomidateHemodynamicsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesEtomidateremimazolamEEG burst suppressionetomidategeneral anesthesia inductionhemodynamic stabilityremimazolam tosilate

Identifiers

PMID40927073
PMCPMC12415106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.