Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926973›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025

Emulating sensation by bridging neuromorphic computing and multisensory integration.

Antonio Bikić, Wolfram H P Pernice

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonio BikićDepartment for Physics and Astronomy, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Baden-Württemberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfram H P PerniceDepartment for Physics and Astronomy, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Baden-Württemberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensory perception produces vast amounts of data requiring efficient processing. This paper focuses on the multisensory example of touch in biological and artificial systems. We integrate philosophical theories of multisensory perception with neuromorphic hardware and demonstrate how classical sensory integration concepts can enhance artificial sensory systems. This approach bridges theoretical neuroscience and computational applications using philosophical tools. We contrast human touch perception, involving feature binding, with artificial perception in neuromorphic computing, where such integration is absent. Two theoretical frameworks are of interest, feature binding and modalities as conventional kinds, in evaluating their relevance to artificial touch. Our findings suggest that a hardware-tailored adaptation of the conventional modalities approach accurately reflects artificial touch perception. Unlike human perception, artificial systems process sensory data separately, lacking binding mechanisms. We explore the implications of these differences, highlighting challenges in replicating human sensory experiences and the role of subjective experience in perception.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefeature bindinghapticneuromorphic computingrepresentationtouch

Identifiers

PMID40926973
PMCPMC12416093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.