Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926970›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025

OpenML: Insights from 10 years and more than a thousand papers.

Bernd Bischl, Giuseppe Casalicchio, Taniya Das, Matthias Feurer, Sebastian Fischer, Pieter Gijsbers, Subhaditya Mukherjee, Andreas C Müller, László Németh, Luis Oala and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Bernd BischlDepartment of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Giuseppe CasalicchioDepartment of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Taniya DasDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Matthias FeurerDepartment of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian FischerDepartment of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Pieter GijsbersDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Subhaditya MukherjeeDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Andreas C MüllerMicrosoft, Mountain View, CA, USA.
László NémethWeierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics, Berlin, Germany.
Luis OalaDotphoton, Zug, Switzerland.
Lennart PuruckerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sahithya RaviDepartment of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jan N van RijnLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Prabhant SinghDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Joaquin VanschorenDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Jos van der VeldeDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marcel WeverL3S Research Center, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OpenML is an open-source platform that democratizes machine-learning evaluation by enabling anyone to share datasets in uniform standards, define precise machine-learning tasks, and automatically share detailed workflows and model evaluations. More than just a platform, OpenML fosters a collaborative ecosystem where scientists create new tools, launch initiatives, and establish standards to advance machine learning. Over the past decade, OpenML has inspired over 1,500 publications across diverse fields, from scientists releasing new datasets and benchmarking new models to educators teaching reproducible science. Looking back, we detail and describe the platform's impact by looking at usage and citations. We share lessons from a decade of building, maintaining, and expanding OpenML, highlighting how rich metadata, collaborative benchmarking, and open interfaces have enhanced research and interoperability. Looking ahead, we cover ongoing efforts to expand OpenML's capabilities and integrate with other platforms, informing a broader vision for open-science infrastructure for machine learning.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomated machine learningbenchmarkingFAIR datamachine learningmeta-learningnetworked scienceOpenMLopen sciencereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID40926970
PMCPMC12416095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.