ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025
Open-source models for development of data and metadata standards.
Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning and artificial intelligence promise to accelerate research and understanding across many scientific disciplines. Harnessing the power of these techniques requires aggregating scientific data. In tandem, the importance of open data for reproducibility and scientific transparency is gaining recognition, and data are increasingly available through digital repositories. Leveraging efforts from disparate data collection sources, however, requires interoperable and adaptable standards for data description and storage. Through the synthesis of experiences in astronomy, high-energy physics, earth science, and neuroscience, we contend that the open-source software (OSS) model provides significant benefits for standard creation and adaptation. We highlight resultant issues, such as balancing flexibility vs. stability and utilizing new computing paradigms and technologies, that must be considered from both the user and developer perspectives to ensure pathways for recognition and sustainability. We recommend supporting and recognizing the development and maintenance of OSS data standards and software consistent with widely adopted scientific tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.