ArticleCureus2025
A Symptom-Based Algorithm for Rapid Clinical Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Adults With High-Risk Exposure.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives In Japan, clinical diagnosis based solely on symptoms, without the use of test kits, has been adopted to enable the rapid identification of individuals infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A history of close contact with COVID-19 patients is a prerequisite for such symptom-based diagnosis. However, the current diagnostic criteria lack objectivity. This study aimed to develop a symptom-based algorithm stratified by vaccination status to support more reliable clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 among individuals with high-risk exposure. Methods This retrospective, single-center study was conducted in Japan between April 2021 and May 2022. An algorithm for predicting COVID-19 infection was developed by comparing symptoms in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative individuals with high-risk exposure. Analyses were stratified by vaccination status, given its potential influence on symptom presentation. Patients A total of 179 individuals with high-risk exposure to COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis. Results The most common setting of close contact was within households or among roommates (55.3%, 99/179), followed by workplace or school settings (26.3%, 47/179). The combination of all three symptoms-fever, sore throat, and cough-demonstrated 100% specificity but low sensitivity, irrespective of vaccination status. Among vaccinated individuals, the combination of sore throat and cough was a more reliable diagnostic indicator, whereas fever was more predictive among unvaccinated individuals. Conclusion The symptom-based diagnostic algorithm developed in this study demonstrated a sensitivity of 65.3% and a specificity of 88.5%, approaching the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen testing. This algorithm may facilitate simple, rapid, and accessible clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 in resource-limited or high-demand settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.