ReviewCureus2025
Safety Considerations and Knowledge Gaps in Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals' Preparedness.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical, life-saving intervention. In pregnant women, unique anatomical and physiological changes require adaptations to standard CPR protocols to ensure optimal outcomes for both mother and fetus, emphasizing the need for universal awareness and standardized training across diverse healthcare systems globally. Despite the high-risk nature of maternal cardiac arrest, evidence suggests that many healthcare professionals may not be adequately prepared to respond effectively. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published between 2004 and 2024 identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Boolean operators were used to combine keywords such as "cardiopulmonary resuscitation," "pregnancy," "knowledge," and "training." Studies assessing healthcare professionals' knowledge or training in maternal CPR were eligible, and seven cross-sectional studies conducted in hospital-based settings met the inclusion criteria. Findings across all studies revealed a consistent gap in knowledge among healthcare providers, including anesthesiologists, obstetricians, emergency physicians, midwives, and nurses. Common deficits included awareness of CPR modifications specific to pregnancy, drug dosing, maternal positioning, and perimortem cesarean protocols. Previous specialized training or real-world clinical exposure positively influenced knowledge levels. The results highlight the urgent need not only for standardized maternal CPR guidelines, but also for their global implementation through mandatory continuing education and simulation-based training. This approach aims to improve preparedness and clinical competence, ultimately enhancing outcomes for both mothers and newborns during cardiopulmonary emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.