Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926854›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Evaluation of

Arnold Parlindungan Sinurat, Tuti Haryati, Maijon Purba, Tiurma Pasaribu, Yan Irawan, Ryan Haryo Setyawan, Ferdy Saputra, Muhammad Ilyas, Nila Miraya, Sumiati Sumiati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arnold Parlindungan SinuratResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Tuti HaryatiResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Maijon PurbaResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Tiurma PasaribuResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Yan IrawanResearch Center for Chemistry, Research Organization for Nanotechnology and Material, National Research and Innovation Agency, Serpong, Tangerang Selatan 15314, Banten, Indonesia.
Ryan Haryo SetyawanResearch Center for Applied Microbiology, Research Organization of Life Sciences and Environment, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Ferdy SaputraResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Muhammad IlyasResearch Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, Research Organization of Life Sciences and Environment, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Nila MirayaResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong, Bogor District 16915, West Java, Indonesia.
Sumiati SumiatiDepartment of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Jl. Agatis, Dramaga Bogor, West Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The global ban on antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in poultry production has intensified the search for effective phytogenic alternatives. Materials and Methods: ACX was produced through double extraction of dried Results: ACX demonstrated antimicrobial activity (MIC = 80 μg/mL) and antioxidant potential (half-maximal inhibitory concentration = 57.3 μg/mL). Supplementing with 20 ppm ACX increased body weight by 7% and improved feed conversion ratio by 8% compared to control birds. Unlike AGPs, ACX supplementation did not increase feed intake, suggesting enhanced nutrient utilization. ACX also reduced abdominal fat and liver weight, with minimal impact on carcass yield or immune-related organs. Microbiota analysis revealed increased abundance of Firmicutes and decreased abundance of Proteobacteria in ACX- and AGP-fed groups, without disrupting microbial diversity. Conclusion: ACX supplementation at 20 ppm effectively enhanced broiler performance, reduced fat deposition, and modulated gut microbiota, offering a promising phytogenic alternative to AGPs. These findings support the integration of

Indexed as

antibiotic alternativesbroiler performanceCurcuma xanthorrhiza Roxbfeed efficiencyileal microbiotaphytogenic additive

Identifiers

PMID40926854
PMCPMC12415131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.