ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2025
Deviance detection and regularity sensitivity in dissociated neuronal cultures.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acetylcholine enhances deviance detection in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Emergence of Deviance Detection in Cortical Cultures Through Maturation, Criticality, and Early Experience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Deviance detection via competitive inhibition between local neocortical ensembles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Measuring the Genuine Mismatch Negativity in the Auditory Multi-Feature Paradigm.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding how neural networks process complex patterns of information is crucial for advancing both neuroscience and artificial intelligence. To investigate fundamental principles of neural computation, we examined whether dissociated neuronal cultures, one of the most primitive living neural networks, exhibit regularity sensitivity beyond mere stimulus-specific adaptation and deviance detection. Methods: We recorded activity to oddball electrical stimulation paradigms from dissociated rat cortical neurons cultured on high-resolution CMOS microelectrode arrays. We examined the effects of pharmacological manipulation on responses using the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. To assess regularity sensitivity, we compared neural responses between predictable periodic sequences and random sequences of stimuli. Results: In oddball electrical stimulation paradigms, we confirmed that the neuronal culture produced mismatch responses (MMRs) with true deviance detection beyond mere adaptation. These MMRs were dependent on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, similar to mismatch negativity (MMN) in humans, which is known to have true deviance detection properties. Crucially, we also showed sensitivity to the statistical regularity of stimuli, a phenomenon previously observed only in intact brains: the MMRs in a predictable, periodic sequence were smaller than those in a commonly used sequence in which the appearance of the deviant stimulus was random and unpredictable. Discussion: These results challenge the traditional view that a hierarchically structured neural network is required to process complex temporal patterns, suggesting instead that deviant detection and regularity sensitivity are inherent properties arising from the primitive neural network. They also suggest new directions for the development of neuro-inspired artificial intelligence systems, emphasizing the importance of incorporating adaptive mechanisms and temporal dynamics in the design of neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.