ArticleVeterinary dermatology2026
Single Cold Atmospheric Plasma Therapy May Improve the Treatment Outcome of Canine Otitis Externa With Secondary Infection.
Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Open-Label Split-Body Clinical Trial Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Canine Acute Otitis Externa.Veterinary dermatology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Dual-Near-Infrared-Wavelength Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Treatment of Canine Otitis Externa: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOtitis externa (OE) with secondary bacterial or yeast infection is a common problem in small animal practice. Cold physical plasma (CPP) has been reported to have antimicrobial activity in vitro. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesThis randomised, blinded, prospective study assessed the influence of additional CPP treatment on the recovery of canine OE with secondary infection. ANIMALS: Twenty-one dogs with bilateral clinical OE and cytological evidence of infection were included. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn ear flush was performed with saline solution in all dogs. Additionally, one ear of each dog, chosen in a prospective randomised fashion, was treated with CPP for 30 s. Afterwards, both ears were treated with a depot ear medication containing betamethasone, terbinafine and florfenicol. Seven days later, the depot medication was administered again as recommended by the manufacturer. On Day (D) 0, D7 and D21, a clinical otic score and a validated semiquantitative cytological score were compared with a Friedman test and Dunn's multiple comparison test.
resultsEars treated additionally with CPP showed lower otic scores after 21 days compared to nontreated ears, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.08). Cytological scores improved over 21 days with cocci in CPP-treated (p = 0.003) and nontreated ears (p = 0.02). With yeast, there was significant improvement in CPP-treated (p = 0.0002) ears in contrast to nontreated ears. With rods, the improvement was not statistically significant in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CPP treatment seems to be a promising option as an additional treatment after ear flushing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.