ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Two-Phase Material Shape Optimization of an Additively Manufactured Integrated Metal and Ceramic Resin Implant-Supported Dental Crown.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two-Phase Material Shape Optimization of an Additively Manufactured Integrated Metal and Ceramic Resin Implant-Supported Dental Crown.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The screw-retained implant-supported crown is a durable, aesthetic restoration, but debonding between the crown and abutment remains a challenge to survivability. The purpose of this work was to devise an abutment shape that can be embedded into the crown while the crown is being additively manufactured. The result was a mechanically retained, no-adhesive abutment and crown unit that is mounted to the implant fixture. To generate the best internal shape for the new restoration design concept, a shape optimization method was developed using nTop software with the objective of pursuing low structural compliance (maximizing stiffness), withstanding mastication loads, and complying with the unique manufacturing constraints of the proposed design. The optimization results showed a 39% and 51% reduction in structural compliance for molar and incisor restorations. Validation finite element analysis (FEA) on the molar restoration was accomplished for comparison of the initial, optimized, and traditional Ti-Base screw-retained designs. Under vertical and angled loads, the optimized design reduced maximum Von Mises stress by 38% compared with the traditional design, and under upwards load, the optimized design reduced maximum principal shear strain along the abutment-crown joint boundary by 67%. A successful prototype was created using a stereolithography (SLA) printer for fit and form testing. The design concept in this study showed promise as an alternate method to join the two components, while removing the debonding failure mode and maintaining aesthetics and strength. This may offer a more suitable screw-retained restoration option for patients with constraints such as small interocclusal space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.