ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
Operationalizing multisector partnerships: a Theory of Action and Reflection tool for zoonotic influenzas.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zoonotic influenzas are major, ongoing public health policy challenge, not the least because of the importance of functional multisector partnerships (MSPs) for their prevention and control. However, despite years of investment in developing them, many countries have found multisectoral approaches, such as One Health, difficult to operationalize at national and subnational levels. One explanation for the lack of uptake is the limited nature of guidance on the design and adaptation of MSPs that consider local institutional dynamics. In this paper, we describe the process of developing a practical framework for assessment and characterization of MSPs. We use findings from an earlier review of academic and programmatic literature to develop a Theory of Action for multisector One Health partnerships that can nest into the short-term outcomes identified in the Theory of Change for One Health developed by the One Health Quadripartite. This comprises five elements: Characteristics; Starting conditions; Collaborative process; Outputs; and Responsiveness. We develop additional attributes to undertake a detailed characterization of different 'levels' of One Health partnerships. In addition, this Theory of Action allows for multiple outcomes of interest to be recognized and addressed. We then use the Theory of Action to develop a reflection tool to help country programme managers identify the specific characteristics of their respective One Health partnerships; recognize the differences in capacities and expectations of different partners; and use these insights to identify specific ways to strengthen the collaborative process. To our knowledge, this is the first time a detailed characterization of MSPs based upon programmatic attributes has been developed. Such a conceptualization of MSPs can facilitate the design, implementation, and evaluation of One Health and other multisector programmes and increase their relevance to the needs of the local context within which these are based.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.