Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40926488›Full record

ReviewBJPsych bulletin2025

Psychiatrists, public mental health and sustainability: understanding the overlap and taking action.

Natalie Cook, Katie Blissard Barnes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie CookTees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK; and RCPsych Planetary Health and Sustainability Committee, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3686-8306
Katie Blissard BarnesLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK; and RCPsych Planetary Health and Sustainability Committee, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-9372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodThrough examining three areas of focus within public mental health; prevention, healthy environments and reducing inequalities, we consider how interventions in these domains also have the potential to create a more sustainable healthcare system.

resultsWe show how psychiatrists and mental health professionals alongside the wider health and social care system can be involved in advocating for this change. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We aim to empower individuals working within mental health to advocate for change and consider how public mental health approaches can be integrated into their practice to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

psychiatristsPublic mental healthsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40926488
PMCPMC13386312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.